Patent Act Article 97-2
Border measures: repeal of detention and subsequent proceduresCustoms shall repeal the detention under any of the following conditions:1. customs has not been notified by the detention requester, within twelve (12) days following the date of Customs’ acceptance of the request, that a litigation claiming that the detained articles infringe the patent right(s) has been initiated in accordance with Article 96;2. a litigation initiated by the detention requester claiming that the detained articles infringe the patent right(s) has been dismissed by a final and binding court judgment;3. a court of law in a final and binding judgment has held that the detained articles do not infringe patent right(s);4. the detention requester has requested the repeal of detention; or5. the condition stated in Paragraph 4 of the preceding article has been met.If necessary, Customs may extend the time period as prescribed in Subparagraph 1 of the preceding paragraph by another twelve (12) days.Customs repealing the detention in accordance with Paragraph 1 shall follow the procedures under applicable regulations governing customs clearance of imported articles.If the detention is repealed in accordance with Subparagraphs 1 through 4 of Paragraph 1, the detention requester shall be liable for relevant costs including demurrage, warehousing, loading, and unloading.
中文原文 專利法第97-2條
有下列情形之一，海關應廢止查扣：
一、申請人於海關通知受理查扣之翌日起十二日內，未依第九十六條規定就查扣物為侵害物提起訴訟，並通知海關者。
二、申請人就查扣物為侵害物所提訴訟經法院裁判駁回確定者。
三、查扣物經法院確定判決，不屬侵害專利權之物者。
四、申請人申請廢止查扣者。
五、符合前條第四項規定者。
前項第一款規定之期限，海關得視需要延長十二日。
海關依第一項規定廢止查扣者，應依有關進口貨物通關規定辦理。
查扣因第一項第一款至第四款之事由廢止者，申請人應負擔查扣物之貨櫃延滯費、倉租、裝卸費等有關費用。
一、申請人於海關通知受理查扣之翌日起十二日內，未依第九十六條規定就查扣物為侵害物提起訴訟，並通知海關者。
二、申請人就查扣物為侵害物所提訴訟經法院裁判駁回確定者。
三、查扣物經法院確定判決，不屬侵害專利權之物者。
四、申請人申請廢止查扣者。
五、符合前條第四項規定者。
前項第一款規定之期限，海關得視需要延長十二日。
海關依第一項規定廢止查扣者，應依有關進口貨物通關規定辦理。
查扣因第一項第一款至第四款之事由廢止者，申請人應負擔查扣物之貨櫃延滯費、倉租、裝卸費等有關費用。