Trademark Act Article 63

Grounds for revocation; revocation of some goods or servicesThe Registrar Office shall, ex officio or upon an application, revoke the registration of a trademark if such trademark is in any of the following:(1)Where the trademark is altered by the proprietor in different forms in which it was registered or supplemented with additional notes whereby the trademark is identical with or similar to another person’s registered trademark in relation to goods or services which are identical with or similar to those for which another person’s registered trademark is designated, and hence there exists a likelihood of confusion on relevant consumers;(2)Where the trademark has not yet been put to use or such use has been suspended for a continuous period of not less than three years without proper reasons for non-use, unless the trademark has been put to use by a licensee;(3)Where no appropriate and distinguishing indication is added pursuant to Article 43, unless the indication has been added and hence there does not exist any likelihood of confusion before the disposition of revocation rendered by the Registrar Office;(4)Where the trademark has become the generic mark or term, or common shape for the designated goods or services; or(5)Where, in consequence of the actual use of the trademark, such trademark is likely to mislead the public as to the nature, quality, or place of origin of the goods or services.The revocation shall also apply in the case where the proprietor of the registered trademark who, knowingly or with reasonable grounds to know, shows no objection to the conduct as prescribed in Subparagraph 1 of preceding paragraph by a licensee.The trademark registration shall not be revoked on the ground prescribed in Subparagraph 2 of Paragraph 1 if such use as in referred to in that subparagraph is commenced or resumed before the application for revocation is filed, unless any such commencement or resumption of use within the period of three months before the filing of the application is because the proprietor became aware that the application might be filed.Where grounds for revocation exist in respect of some of the designated goods or services of the registered trademark, the registration may be revoked in respect of those goods or services.
中文原文 商標法第63條
商標註冊後有下列情形之一,商標專責機關應依職權或據申請廢止其註冊:
一、自行變換商標或加附記,致與他人使用於同一或類似之商品或服務之註冊商標構成相同或近似,而有使相關消費者混淆誤認之虞者。
二、無正當事由迄未使用或繼續停止使用已滿三年者。
但被授權人有使用者,不在此限。
三、未依第四十三條規定附加適當區別標示者。
但於商標專責機關處分前已附加區別標示並無產生混淆誤認之虞者,不在此限。
四、商標已成為所指定商品或服務之通用標章、名稱或形狀者。
五、商標實際使用時有致公眾誤認誤信其商品或服務之性質、品質或產地之虞者。
被授權人為前項第一款之行為,商標權人明知或可得而知而不為反對之表示者,亦同。
有第一項第二款規定之情形,於申請廢止時該註冊商標已為使用者,除因知悉他人將申請廢止,而於申請廢止前三個月內開始使用者外,不予廢止其註冊。
廢止之事由僅存在於註冊商標所指定使用之部分商品或服務者,得就該部分之商品或服務廢止其註冊。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.