Prison Act Article 153
Motions of objection to revoked parole that are pending in court but not yet concluded before the implementation of the amendment of this Act on December 17, 2019 shall still be processed by the original court in accordance with the Judicial Yuan Interpretation No. Shi-Zi-681 and tried in accordance with the Code of Criminal Procedure after the implementation of the amendment.The interlocutory appeals and re-appeals of the decision in the preceding paragraph and the interlocutory appeals and re-appeals for objection cases already concluded by a district court or High Court filed before the implementation of the amendment of this Act on December 17, 2019 that are not yet concluded shall be processed by the High Court or Supreme Court in accordance with the Judicial Yuan Interpretation No. Shi-Zi-681 and tried in accordance with the Code of Criminal Procedure after the implementation of the amendment.For cases involving revoked parole where objection may be filed before the implementation of the amendment of this Act on December 17, 2019, litigation may be filed with the administrative litigation division of the jurisdictional district court in accordance with this Act within thirty (30) days starting from the day following the implementation date of the amendment.Administrative litigation cases involving denied parole pending in the High Administrative Court in accordance with Judicial Yuan Interpretation No. Shi-Zi-691 before the implementation of the amendment of this Act on December 17, 2019 shall be processed in accordance with the following provisions after the implementation of the amendment:1. Where the case has not been concluded: The High Administrative Court shall decide the transfer of the case to the administrative litigation division of the jurisdictional district court for trial in accordance with this Act; the same shall apply for appeals and interlocutory appeals.2. Where the case has been concluded: The appeals and interlocutory appeals shall be processed in accordance with the original litigation procedures and the regulations after the implementation of the amendment shall not apply.Cases involving denied parole specified in the preceding paragraph that are pending in the High Administrative Court in accordance with Judicial Yuan Interpretation No. Shi-Zi-691 before the implementation of the amendment of this Act on December 17, 2019 but are not yet concluded shall still be processed in accordance with the original litigation procedures, to which the provisions after the implementation of the amendment do not apply. Appeals or interlocutory appeals shall be rejected if deemed as illegal or meritless; where they are found to have reason, a decision in favor of the appellant or interlocutory appeal appellant shall be rendered. Where necessary, the case may be transferred to the administrative litigation division of the jurisdictional district court and tried in accordance with the provisions herein after the implementation of the amendment.Motions or petitions for retrial filed against a concluded administrative litigation decision on denying parole before the implementation of the amendment of this Act on December 17, 2019 shall be processed by the High Administrative Court or Supreme Administrative Court in accordance with the original litigation procedures, to which the provisions herein after the implementation of the amendment do not apply.
中文原文 監獄行刑法第153條
本法中華民國一百零八年十二月十七日修正之條文施行前，因撤銷假釋已繫屬於法院之聲明異議案件，尚未終結者，於修正施行後，仍由原法院依司法院釋字第六八一號解釋意旨，依刑事訴訟法之規定審理。
前項裁定之抗告、再抗告及本法中華民國一百零八年十二月十七日修正之條文施行前已由地方法院或高等法院終結之聲明異議案件之抗告、再抗告案件，尚未終結者，於修正施行後由高等法院或最高法院依司法院釋字第六八一號解釋意旨，依刑事訴訟法之規定審理。
本法中華民國一百零八年十二月十七日修正之條文施行前，因撤銷假釋得聲明異議之案件，得於修正施行日之次日起算三十日內，依本法規定向管轄地方法院行政訴訟庭提起訴訟。
本法中華民國一百零八年十二月十七日修正之條文施行前，因不予許可假釋而依司法院釋字第六九一號解釋已繫屬於高等行政法院之行政訴訟事件，於修正施行後，依下列規定辦理：
一、尚未終結者：由高等行政法院裁定移送管轄之地方法院行政訴訟庭，依本法規定審理；其上訴、抗告，亦同。
二、已終結者：其上訴、抗告，仍依原訴訟程序規定辦理，不適用修正施行後之規定。
本法中華民國一百零八年十二月十七日修正之條文施行前，因不予許可假釋而依司法院釋字第六九一號解釋已繫屬於最高行政法院，而於修正施行時，尚未終結之前項事件，仍依原訴訟程序規定辦理，不適用修正施行後之規定。
如認上訴或抗告不合法或無理由者，應予駁回；有理由者，應為上訴人或抗告人勝訴之裁判；必要時，發交管轄之地方法院行政訴訟庭依修正施行後之條文審判之。
本法中華民國一百零八年十二月十七日修正之條文施行前確定之不予許可假釋行政訴訟事件裁判，其再審之提起或聲請，由高等行政法院、最高行政法院依原訴訟程序規定辦理，不適用修正施行後之規定。
前項裁定之抗告、再抗告及本法中華民國一百零八年十二月十七日修正之條文施行前已由地方法院或高等法院終結之聲明異議案件之抗告、再抗告案件，尚未終結者，於修正施行後由高等法院或最高法院依司法院釋字第六八一號解釋意旨，依刑事訴訟法之規定審理。
本法中華民國一百零八年十二月十七日修正之條文施行前，因撤銷假釋得聲明異議之案件，得於修正施行日之次日起算三十日內，依本法規定向管轄地方法院行政訴訟庭提起訴訟。
本法中華民國一百零八年十二月十七日修正之條文施行前，因不予許可假釋而依司法院釋字第六九一號解釋已繫屬於高等行政法院之行政訴訟事件，於修正施行後，依下列規定辦理：
一、尚未終結者：由高等行政法院裁定移送管轄之地方法院行政訴訟庭，依本法規定審理；其上訴、抗告，亦同。
二、已終結者：其上訴、抗告，仍依原訴訟程序規定辦理，不適用修正施行後之規定。
本法中華民國一百零八年十二月十七日修正之條文施行前，因不予許可假釋而依司法院釋字第六九一號解釋已繫屬於最高行政法院，而於修正施行時，尚未終結之前項事件，仍依原訴訟程序規定辦理，不適用修正施行後之規定。
如認上訴或抗告不合法或無理由者，應予駁回；有理由者，應為上訴人或抗告人勝訴之裁判；必要時，發交管轄之地方法院行政訴訟庭依修正施行後之條文審判之。
本法中華民國一百零八年十二月十七日修正之條文施行前確定之不予許可假釋行政訴訟事件裁判，其再審之提起或聲請，由高等行政法院、最高行政法院依原訴訟程序規定辦理，不適用修正施行後之規定。