Prison Act Article 134

Where an inmate disagrees with a decision to cancel parole, deny parole, or revoke parole, and files a petition in accordance with this Act and the inmate disagrees with the decision rendered, or a decision is not made within two months after the petition is filed, or the petition decision is extended for more than two months and a decision has not been made, the inmate may file a revocation suit to the administrative litigation division of the jurisdictional district court at the location of the prison or the place of probation.Where the status quo ante cannot be restored or is destroyed due to the execution of the decision in the preceding subparagraph but the inmate has a legal interest in obtaining a declaratory judgment from the court, the inmate may file a suit for court declaration of illegal disposition. Where the inmate believes the decision in the preceding paragraph to be invalid and the inmate has a legal interest in obtaining a declaratory judgment from the court, the inmate may file a suit for court declaration of invalid dispositionThe suits filed in accordance with the two preceding paragraphs shall be filed in a written format.
中文原文 監獄行刑法第134條
受刑人對於廢止假釋、不予許可假釋或撤銷假釋之處分不服,經依本法提起復審而不服其決定,或提起復審逾二個月不為決定或延長復審決定期間逾二個月不為決定者,應向監獄所在地或執行保護管束地之地方法院行政訴訟庭提起撤銷訴訟。
前項處分因已執行而無回復原狀可能或已消滅,有即受確認判決之法律上利益者,得提起確認處分違法之訴訟。
其認為前項處分無效,有即受確認判決之法律上利益者,得提起確認處分無效之訴訟。
前二項訴訟之提起,應以書狀為之。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.