Enforcement Rules of the Crime Victim Rights Protection Act Article 30

1 The cause of intentional or gross negligence as stipulated in Article 59, subparagraph 1 of the Act may be considered according to the following circumstances:1. For those crime victims intentionally cause the crime through improper conduct such as violence, coercion, or insult;2. For those crime victims promised, instigated, or assistedthe crime.3. For those crime victims who commit gross negligence in the occurrence of the victimization.2 The reasons specified in Article 59, subparagraph 2 of the Act may be considered according to the following circumstances:1. The applicant is qualified to apply as stipulated in Article 53, Paragraph 1 of the Act , whose relationship to the crime victim is, in fact, obviously alienated.2. The applicant is obliged to prevent the criminal conduct from occurring but passively not to fulfill his obligation.3. There are other specific circumstances that payment of compensation could clearly have an implication of offending against public order or good customs.3 Where the Review Committee applies the provisions of the previous two paragraphs, prudent identification of the provisions shall be applied depending on specific circumstances of the case.
中文原文 犯罪被害人保護法施行細則第30條
本法第五十九條第一款所定故意或重大過失之事由,得依下列情形審酌之:
一、犯罪被害人故意以強暴、脅迫、侮辱等不正當之行為引起該犯罪行為者。
二、犯罪被害人承諾或教唆、幫助該犯罪行為者。
三、犯罪被害人對其被害之發生有重大過失者。
本法第五十九條第二款所定之事由,得依下列情形審酌之:
一、申請人為本法第五十三條第一項之申請權人,惟事實上親屬與犯罪被害人之關係顯然疏離者。
二、申請人對於該犯罪行為之發生,負有防免之義務,而消極未盡其義務。
三、有其他具體情事,足認支付犯罪被害補償金顯有違公共秩序或善良風俗之虞者。
審議會於適用前二項規定時,應視具體個案情節,審慎認定之。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.