The Communication Security and Surveillance Act Article 6

If there are sufficient facts to support that the accused or the suspect is committing the offenses of interference with voting as stated in the Criminal Code; the offenses as stipulated in the Civil Servants Election and Recall Act, the Presidential and Vice Presidential Election and Recall Act, Articles 7 and 8 of the Act Governing the Control and Prohibition of Guns, Cannon, Ammunition, and Knives, Article 4 of the Narcotics Hazard Prevention Act; the offenses of Extortion and Kidnapping for Ransom, or the offenses of Extortion by means of using bombs, explosives, or poison; offenses as stipulated in Article 3 of the Organized Crime Prevention Act, Article 19 of the Money Laundering Control Act, Article 8 of the Counter-Terrorism Financing Act, Article 222, Article 226, Article 271, Article 302-1, Article 325, Article 326, Article 328, Article 330, Article 332, Article 339, Article 339-3 or Article 339-4 of the Criminal Code, Articles 43 and 44 of the Fraud Crime Hazard Prevention Act, in order to protect people's lives, bodies, or property from immediate harm, or there are facts justifying the existence of other communications that are used for contact in order to commit the offenses under Paragraph 1 of the preceding Article and the situation is urgent, the judicial police authority may report to the prosecutor concerned, who will then verbally inform the enforcement agency to give priority to the communication surveillance. However, the prosecutor should inform the enforcement agency of the content as delineated in Article 11, and report to the court concerned within 24 hours and request the issuance of an interception warrant; the prosecutorial agency should designate a Head Prosecutor, or a prosecutor, as an emergency contact to facilitate the investigation in a timely manner.The court should designate a specific communication contact to handle the case, and should issue an interception warrant within 48 hours; if an interception warrant is not issued within 48 hours, the surveillance activity should be halted.