Money Laundering Control Act Article 18

When a prosecutor obtains sufficient evidence during investigation to believe that an offender has committed an offence prescribed in Articles 19 and 20 by moving property through bank accounts, wire transfers, currency exchanges or other means of payment, the prosecutor may request a court order to prohibit the withdrawal, transfer, payment, delivery and assignment, or to make other necessary disposition of such property, for not more than six months. The prosecutor may, in his or her own authority, stop the above-mentioned transactions, in the event that the situation is urgent and reasonable cause is identified to believe that actions needed to be taken immediately to ensure the integrity of the confiscated property or evidence. However, a court order should be applied for subsequently within three days of the action. In the event that a court order is not issued, or that the prosecutor fails to apply for such an order within three days of the action, the action should be called to a halt immediately.The judge may, at his or her discretion, decide whether to issue a court order to prohibit the withdrawal, transfer, payment, delivery and assignment, or to make other necessary disposition of the property prescribed in the previous paragraph during the trial.The court order prescribed in the preceding two paragraphs should be put into writing and be subject to provisions under Article 128 of the Criminal Procedure Code.In the event that an extension of the action prescribed in paragraph 1 is deemed necessary, an application for extension can be made to the court for a ruling by the prosecutor with specific reasons included, not later than five days before the expiration of the period. However, the extension may not exceed six months, and only one extension will be granted at most.In the event that a request for assistance is made by foreign governments, institutions or international organizations, based on treaties or agreements concluded in accordance with Article 28, or on the principle of reciprocity, if the criminal activity involved constitutes an offence prescribed in Article 3, the preceding four paragraphs may also apply, even if the investigation or trial does not take place in the jurisdiction of the country.When the court order prescribed in paragraphs 1 and 2, or the ruling prescribed in paragraph 4, is found disappointing, provisions concerning interlocutory appeal under Part IV of the Criminal Procedure Code will apply.
中文原文 洗錢防制法第18條
檢察官於偵查中,有事實足認被告利用帳戶、匯款、通貨或其他支付工具犯第十九條或第二十條之罪者,得聲請該管法院指定六個月以內之期間,對該筆交易之財產為禁止提款、轉帳、付款、交付、轉讓或其他必要處分之命令。
其情況急迫,有相當理由足認非立即為上開命令,不能保全得沒收之財產或證據者,檢察官得逕命執行之,但應於執行後三日內,聲請法院補發命令。
法院如不於三日內補發或檢察官未於執行後三日內聲請法院補發命令者,應即停止執行。
前項禁止提款、轉帳、付款、交付、轉讓或其他必要處分之命令,法官於審判中得依職權為之。
前二項命令,應以書面為之,並準用刑事訴訟法第一百二十八條規定。
第一項之指定期間如有繼續延長之必要者,檢察官應檢附具體理由,至遲於期間屆滿之前五日聲請該管法院裁定。
但延長期間不得逾六個月,並以延長一次為限。
對於外國政府、機構或國際組織依第二十八條所簽訂之條約或協定或基於互惠原則請求我國協助之案件,如所涉之犯罪行為符合第三條所列之罪,雖非在我國偵查或審判中者,亦得準用前四項規定。
對第一項、第二項之命令、第四項之裁定不服者,準用刑事訴訟法第四編抗告之規定。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.