Narcotics Hazard Prevention Act Article 35
Pending drug abuse cases perpetrated prior to the enactment of the amendment of this Act on June 6, 2003, shall have the provisions of the amendment applied after its enactment, and shall be handled in accordance with the following measures:1.Cases in the process of undergoing an observation, rehabilitation, or compulsory rehabilitation program shall have the amended provisions concerning observation, rehabilitation and compulsory rehabilitation applied.2.Cases under investigation shall be handled by the prosecutor pursuant to the amended provisions.3.Cases already in trial, shall be handled by the court or the juvenile court (juvenile court of a district court) pursuant to the amended provisions.4.Cases already in trial that should be adjudicated as non-prosecution, or not-to-be-tried pursuant to the amended provisions, shall be adjudicated by the court or the juvenile court (juvenile court of a district court) as exempt from punishment or not-to-apply-protective measures.In situations described in the preceding Paragraph, where provisions prior to the amendment were conducive to the violator, the most conducive regulations to the violator shall apply.
中文原文 毒品危害防制條例第35條
於中華民國九十二年六月六日本條例修正施行前繫屬之施用毒品案件，於修正施行後，適用修正後之規定，並依下列方式處理：
一、觀察、勒戒及強制戒治中之案件，適用修正後觀察、勒戒及強制戒治之規定。
二、偵查中之案件，由檢察官依修正後規定處理之。
三、審判中之案件，由法院或少年法院（地方法院少年法庭）依修正後規定處理之。
四、審判中之案件，依修正後之規定應為不起訴之處分或不付審理之裁定者，法院或少年法院（地方法院少年法庭）應為免刑之判決或不付保護處分之裁定。
前項情形，依修正前之規定有利於行為人者，適用最有利於行為人之法律。
一、觀察、勒戒及強制戒治中之案件，適用修正後觀察、勒戒及強制戒治之規定。
二、偵查中之案件，由檢察官依修正後規定處理之。
三、審判中之案件，由法院或少年法院（地方法院少年法庭）依修正後規定處理之。
四、審判中之案件，依修正後之規定應為不起訴之處分或不付審理之裁定者，法院或少年法院（地方法院少年法庭）應為免刑之判決或不付保護處分之裁定。
前項情形，依修正前之規定有利於行為人者，適用最有利於行為人之法律。