Attorney Regulation Act Article 106

After the resolution of the Attorney Disciplinary Committee or the Attorney Disciplinary Re-examination Committee is concluded, under any of the following circumstances, the original authority or the organizations referring to disciplinary proceedings or the person subject to disciplinary actions may petition for re-consideration:1. There are obvious errors in the application of laws or regulations;2. The organization of the Attorney Disciplinary Committee or the Attorney Disciplinary Re-examination Committee is illegal;3. Any member who should be recused by law participates in the resolution;4. Any member participating in the resolution acts against his/her duties and has been proved to have committed criminal offences, or such member is subject to any disciplinary actions for violation of his/her duties relating to the resolution that may affect the original resolution;5. The testimony, appraisal, interpretation or exhibit on which the original resolution is based, is determined and proved to be false, forged or altered;6. The same conduct is subsequently ruled not to prosecute, or a criminal judgment based on a resolution has been changed due to a subsequently concluded decision;7. Any new, authentic evidence is found, which is deemed that the original resolution should be changed;8. Important evidence that may affect the original resolution has not been considered; or9. The law or order that applies to the resolution has been interpreted by the grand justice of the Judicial Yuan as a violation of the Constitution.
中文原文 律師法第106條
律師懲戒委員會或律師懲戒覆審委員會之決議確定後,有下列各款情形之一者,原移送懲戒機關、團體或受懲戒處分人,得聲請再審議:
一、適用法規顯有錯誤。
二、律師懲戒委員會或律師懲戒覆審委員會之組織不合法。
三、依法律應迴避之委員參與決議。
四、參與決議之委員關於該決議違背職務,犯刑事上之罪已經證明,或關於該決議違背職務受懲戒處分,足以影響原決議。
五、原決議所憑之證言、鑑定、通譯或證物經確定判決,證明其為虛偽或偽造、變造。
六、同一行為其後經不起訴處分確定,或為決議基礎之刑事判決,依其後之確定裁判已變更。
七、發現確實之新證據,足認應變更原決議。
八、就足以影響原決議之重要證據,漏未斟酌。
九、確定決議所適用之法律或命令,經司法院大法官解釋為牴觸憲法。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.