The Arbitration Law of ROC Article 9
Where an arbitration agreement does not specify arbitrators or the method of their appointment, each party shall appoint an arbitrator, and the appointed arbitrators shall jointly select a third arbitrator to serve as the presiding arbitrator. The arbitral tribunal shall notify the parties in writing of the appointments.If the arbitrators fail to agree on the presiding arbitrator within thirty days, either party may petition the court for appointment.Where a sole arbitrator is stipulated and the parties fail to agree within thirty days after receiving a written request for appointment, either party may petition the court for appointment.Under the circumstances of the preceding two paragraphs, if the parties have agreed that the arbitration shall be administered by an arbitration institution, then the arbitrator shall be appointed by the arbitration institution.Where a party consists of two or more individuals and no agreement is reached regarding the appointment of an arbitrator, the appointment shall be made by a majority vote; In the event of a tie, the appointment shall be made by drawing lots.
中文原文 仲裁法第9條
仲裁協議,未約定仲裁人及其選定方法者,應由雙方當事人各選一仲裁人,再由雙方選定之仲裁人共推第三仲裁人為主任仲裁人,並由仲裁庭以書面通知當事人。
仲裁人於選定後三十日內未共推主任仲裁人者,當事人得聲請法院為之選定。
仲裁協議約定由單一之仲裁人仲裁,而當事人之一方於收受他方選定仲裁人之書面要求後三十日內未能達成協議時,當事人一方得聲請法院為之選定。
前二項情形,於當事人約定仲裁事件由仲裁機構辦理者,由該仲裁機構選定仲裁人。
當事人之一方有二人以上,而對仲裁人之選定未達成協議者,依多數決定之;人數相等時,以抽籤定之。
仲裁人於選定後三十日內未共推主任仲裁人者,當事人得聲請法院為之選定。
仲裁協議約定由單一之仲裁人仲裁,而當事人之一方於收受他方選定仲裁人之書面要求後三十日內未能達成協議時,當事人一方得聲請法院為之選定。
前二項情形,於當事人約定仲裁事件由仲裁機構辦理者,由該仲裁機構選定仲裁人。
當事人之一方有二人以上,而對仲裁人之選定未達成協議者,依多數決定之;人數相等時,以抽籤定之。