The Arbitration Law of ROC Article 40

A party may file a motion to set aside an arbitral award under any of the following circumstances:1.Any of the circumstances set forth in Article 38 apply.2.The arbitration agreement was not formed, is invalid, or had not taken effect or had become ineffective at the time the arbitral tribunal concluded its hearings.3.The arbitral tribunal failed to allow the parties to present their arguments before concluding its hearings, or a party was not duly represented in the arbitration proceedings.4.The composition of the arbitral tribunal or the arbitration proceedings violated the arbitration agreement or the law.5.An arbitrator violated the disclosure obligations prescribed in Paragraph 2 of Article 15 and is biased, or participated in the arbitration despite being subject to a challenge, unless the challenge was dismissed pursuant to this Law.6.An arbitrator participating in the arbitration committed a criminal offense in relation to the arbitration by breaching their duties.7.A party or its representative committed a criminal offense in relation to the arbitration.8.The evidence or interpretation upon which the arbitration award relies, was forged, altered, or is otherwise fraudulent.9.If a judgment of a criminal or civil matter, or an administrative ruling upon which the arbitration award relies, has been reversed or materially altered by a final judgment or administrative ruling.The circumstances described in subparagraphs 6 to 8 of the preceding paragraph shall be limited to cases where a guilty verdict has been rendered and finalized, or where criminal proceedings cannot be commenced or continued for reasons other than insufficient evidence.The circumstances described in subparagraph 4 regarding violations of the arbitration agreement, as well as subparagraphs 5 to 9, shall be limited to cases where such violations are sufficient to affect the outcome of the arbitral award.
中文原文 仲裁法第40條
有下列各款情形之一者,當事人得對於他方提起撤銷仲裁判斷之訴︰一、有第三十八條各款情形之一者。
二、仲裁協議不成立、無效,或於仲裁庭詢問終結時尚未生效或已失效者。
三、仲裁庭於詢問終結前未使當事人陳述,或當事人於仲裁程序未經合法代理者。
四、仲裁庭之組成或仲裁程序,違反仲裁協議或法律規定者。
五、仲裁人違反第十五條第二項所定之告知義務而顯有偏頗或被聲請迴避而仍參與仲裁者。
但迴避之聲請,經依本法駁回者,不在此限。
六、參與仲裁之仲裁人,關於仲裁違背職務,犯刑事上之罪者。
七、當事人或其代理人,關於仲裁犯刑事上之罪者。
八、為判斷基礎之證據、通譯內容係偽造、變造或有其他虛偽情事者。
九、為判斷基礎之民事、刑事及其他裁判或行政處分,依其後之確定裁判或行政處分已變更者。
前項第六款至第八款情形,以宣告有罪之判決已確定,或其刑事訴訟不能開始或續行非因證據不足者為限。
第一項第四款違反仲裁協議及第五款至第九款情形,以足以影響判斷之結果為限。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.