The Arbitration Law of ROC Article 37

The award shall, as applicable, be binding on the parties and have the same force as a final judgment of a court.An award shall not be enforceable unless a competent court has on application of a concerned party, granted an enforcement order. However, the arbitral award may be enforced without an enforcement order granted by a competent court if the parties to the arbitration so agree in writing and the arbitral award concerns any of the following subject matters:1.Payment of a specified sum of money or a certain amount of fungible goods or valuable securities;2.Delivery of a specified movable property.The provision of the preceding paragraph is binding not only on the parties but also on the following persons with respect to the arbitration:1.Successors of the parties after the commencement of the arbitration, or those who have taken possession of the contested property for a party or its successors.2.Any entity on whose behalf a party enters into an arbitration proceeding; the successors of said entity after the commencement of arbitration; and those who have taken possession of the contested property for said entity or its successors.
中文原文 仲裁法第37條
仲裁人之判斷,於當事人間,與法院之確定判決,有同一效力。
仲裁判斷,須聲請法院為執行裁定後,方得為強制執行。
但合於下列規定之一,並經當事人雙方以書面約定仲裁判斷無須法院裁定即得為強制執行者,得逕為強制執行︰一、以給付金錢或其他代替物或有價證券之一定數量為標的者。
二、以給付特定之動產為標的者。
前項強制執行之規定,除當事人外,對於下列之人,就該仲裁判斷之法律關係,亦有效力︰一、仲裁程序開始後為當事人之繼受人及為當事人或其繼受人占有請求之標的物者。
二、為他人而為當事人者之該他人及仲裁程序開始後為該他人之繼受人,及為該他人或其繼受人占有請求之標的物者。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.