Enforcement Law for Part V,Succession Law of the Civil Code Article 1-3
This English translation was last updated on 2013-01-30, but the Chinese text was amended on 2026-08-17. Later amendments may not be reflected in the translation — please refer to the Chinese text.
If the succession commenced before May 22, 2009, the effective date of the amended Succession of Civil Code, heirs have not exceeded the statutory period for asserting limited succession and do not assert general succession or waived succession, assertion of limited succession will be subject to the new amended Articles 1148, 1153-1163 of the Civil Code from the effective date of the amendment.If the succession commences before May 22, 2009, the effective date of the amended Succession of Civil Code, heirs have paid debt resulting from guaranty agreement for the decedent before the opening of succession; the heirs are liable for the obligations of the estate only to the extent of the property acquired from the estate. But this does not apply when creditors prove that it is obviously unfair to them.If the succession commences before May 22, 2009, the effective date of the amended Succession of the Civil Code and heirs, based on Article 1140 of the Civil Code, have inherited in subrogation, the heirs are liable for the obligations of the estate only to the extent of the property acquired from the estate. But this does not apply when creditors prove that it is obviously unfair to them.Where the succession commences before May 22, 2009, the effective date of the amended Succession of Civil Code, heirs, who by reason of circumstances to which they are not imputed or do not cohabitation and share wealth with the decedent and who do not know the existence of debt resulting from succession upon the opening of the succession, are not able to assert limited succession or waived succession during statutory period before this Amendment is in effect. The heirs are liable for the obligations of the estate only to the extent of the property acquired from the estate. But this does not apply when creditors prove that it is obviously unfair to them.If heirs, who qualify under the proceeding three Paragraphs, have satisfied the obligations of the estate prior to the effective date of this amendment, he or she cannot seek refund of payments made.
中文原文 民法繼承編施行法第1-3條
繼承在民法繼承編中華民國九十八年五月二十二日修正施行前開始,繼承人未逾修正施行前為限定繼承之法定期間且未為概括繼承之表示或拋棄繼承者,自修正施行之日起,適用修正後民法第一千一百四十八條、第一千一百五十三條至第一千一百六十三條之規定。
繼承在民法繼承編中華民國九十八年五月二十二日修正施行前開始,繼承人對於繼承開始以前已發生代負履行責任之保證契約債務,以所得遺產為限,負清償責任。
但債權人證明顯失公平者,不在此限。
繼承在民法繼承編中華民國九十八年五月二十二日修正施行前開始,繼承人已依民法第一千一百四十條之規定代位繼承,以所得遺產為限,負清償責任。
但債權人證明顯失公平者,不在此限。
繼承在民法繼承編中華民國九十八年五月二十二日修正施行前開始,繼承人因不可歸責於己之事由或未同居共財者,於繼承開始時無法知悉繼承債務之存在,致未能於修正施行前之法定期間為限定或拋棄繼承,以所得遺產為限,負清償責任。
但債權人證明顯失公平者,不在此限。
前三項繼承人依修正施行前之規定已清償之債務,不得請求返還。
繼承在民法繼承編中華民國九十八年五月二十二日修正施行前開始,繼承人對於繼承開始以前已發生代負履行責任之保證契約債務,以所得遺產為限,負清償責任。
但債權人證明顯失公平者,不在此限。
繼承在民法繼承編中華民國九十八年五月二十二日修正施行前開始,繼承人已依民法第一千一百四十條之規定代位繼承,以所得遺產為限,負清償責任。
但債權人證明顯失公平者,不在此限。
繼承在民法繼承編中華民國九十八年五月二十二日修正施行前開始,繼承人因不可歸責於己之事由或未同居共財者,於繼承開始時無法知悉繼承債務之存在,致未能於修正施行前之法定期間為限定或拋棄繼承,以所得遺產為限,負清償責任。
但債權人證明顯失公平者,不在此限。
前三項繼承人依修正施行前之規定已清償之債務,不得請求返還。