Regulations Governing Accreditation of Teacher Qualifications at Junior Colleges and Institutions of Higher Education Article 49
This English translation was last updated on 2022-08-17, but the Chinese text was amended on 2023-08-30. Later amendments may not be reflected in the translation — please refer to the Chinese text.
If a teacher files an appeal with the appeal handling body or some other body to remedy the situation and the institution is asked to handle the case in accordance with the provisions of the relevant ordinances but still does not do so, if the same appeal handling body that received the teacher’s appeal or the remedy body determines that the institution is acting against the law, a higher level teacher evaluation committee may re-conduct the review procedures in accordance with the regulations from the stage when the review procedures should be reopened. If an institution level teacher evaluation committee fails to handle the case in accordance with the relevant ordinances governing such reviews, the Ministry shall order the institution to complete corrective action within a specified time. If the required corrective action is not satisfactorily completed within the specified time the institution shall be dealt with in accordance with the provisions of Paragraph 2 of Article 50, and the institution shall also formulate some other legally appropriate mechanism for handling cases and incorporate that mechanism into the institution’s rules and publicly announce this.If a particular teacher at an institution has filed two or more appeals regarding the same case, and the appeal handling body or the remedy body determined each time that the institution is acting against the law, the teacher may apply to the Ministry for an external review. If the Ministry determines that it is necessary, the Ministry may commission an external review body to conduct the review of the academic writing, creative works, evidence of achievement, or technical reports to undertake this review procedure externally instead of it being done by the institution.
中文原文 專科以上學校教師資格審定辦法第49條
學校對經教師申訴受理機關或其他救濟機關要求依相關法令規定辦理,仍不辦理者,經同一教師申訴受理機關或救濟機關再判定違法者,得由高一級之教評會自案件應重行辦理階段,依規定續行辦理;校級教評會未依相關送審法令辦理者,本部應令其限期改善,屆期未改善者,依第五十條第二項規定處理,學校並將另為適法處理機制,納入校內章則並公告。
學校教師同一案件經同一教師申訴受理機關或救濟機關判定違法達二次以上者,該教師得向本部申請代審,經本部認定有必要者,本部得委由代審機構辦理其專門著作、作品、成就證明或技術報告之審查,替代學校外審程序。
學校教師同一案件經同一教師申訴受理機關或救濟機關判定違法達二次以上者,該教師得向本部申請代審,經本部認定有必要者,本部得委由代審機構辦理其專門著作、作品、成就證明或技術報告之審查,替代學校外審程序。