Regulations Governing Accreditation of Teacher Qualifications at Junior Colleges and Institutions of Higher Education Article 47
This English translation was last updated on 2022-08-17, but the Chinese text was amended on 2023-08-30. Later amendments may not be reflected in the translation — please refer to the Chinese text.
If an applicant has been reported as committing or found to be involved in any one of the circumstances referred to in the subparagraphs of Paragraph 1 of Article 44 after the Ministry has approved an accreditation, the institution shall report the facts that have been determined and the recommended disciplinary action to the Ministry for its review.Before the institution sends a case to the Ministry for a review, or if an applicant at an approved institution（including any institution given partial approval）has been reported as committing or found to be involved in any of the circumstances referred to in any of the subparagraphs of Paragraph 1 of Article 44, during the accreditation review period or after the accreditation review is completed, the case shall, mutatis mutandis, be handled in accordance with the provisions of Article 44 to the previous Article, and for the associated period referred to in Article 44, beginning from the date that the institution-level teacher evaluation committee makes its determination, no application for a review and decision regarding that teacher’s accreditation will be dealt with. When a case has been duly considered and a confirmed determination made, the institution shall report the deliberation procedures and the disciplinary action taken to the Ministry for future reference.If the Ministry finds that there is a suspicion of a violation of law or impropriety in the handling of cases involving the subparagraphs of Article 44, Paragraph 1, the Ministry shall make a specific determination and recommendation on the circumstances of the violation for the institution to proceed accordingly.An applicant who has been reported as committing or found to be involved in any one of the circumstances referred to in any of the subparagraphs of Paragraph 1 of Article 44 is not permitted to apply to have their accreditation review case cancelled, and it shall continue being handled in accordance with the procedures.
中文原文 專科以上學校教師資格審定辦法第47條
教師資格經本部審定後，經檢舉或發現送審人涉及第四十四條第一項各款情事之一者，應將其認定情形及處置建議，報本部審查。
學校於報本部審查前、認可學校（包括部分認可學校）之送審人於送審中或其教師資格經審定後，經檢舉或發現涉及第四十四條第一項各款情事之一者，應準用第四十四條至前條規定處理，並依第四十四條所定期間，自校級教評會審議決定之日起，為不受理其教師資格審定之申請，經審議確定成立者，將審議程序及處置結果，報本部備查。
本部發現學校處理涉及第四十四條第一項各款情事之案件有違法或不當之疑義者，應針對案件違反情形作成具體認定及建議，交付學校據以辦理。
送審人經檢舉或發現涉及第四十四條第一項各款情事之一者，不得申請撤回資格審查案，仍應依程序處理。
學校於報本部審查前、認可學校（包括部分認可學校）之送審人於送審中或其教師資格經審定後，經檢舉或發現涉及第四十四條第一項各款情事之一者，應準用第四十四條至前條規定處理，並依第四十四條所定期間，自校級教評會審議決定之日起，為不受理其教師資格審定之申請，經審議確定成立者，將審議程序及處置結果，報本部備查。
本部發現學校處理涉及第四十四條第一項各款情事之案件有違法或不當之疑義者，應針對案件違反情形作成具體認定及建議，交付學校據以辦理。
送審人經檢舉或發現涉及第四十四條第一項各款情事之一者，不得申請撤回資格審查案，仍應依程序處理。