Regulations for Selection and Fee Calculation of Professional Services Providers Entrusted by Entities Article 8
The price negotiation between the entity and the winning provider shall be conducted by one of the following methods, and the method adopted shall be stated in the invitation documents:1.Where only one winning provider is selected, price negotiation shall be followed.2.Where two or more winning providers are selected, price negotiation shall be conducted in a sequence according to the ranking of the winning providers, commencing from the provider which attains the first ranking. In the event where two or more providers have the same ranking, the provider with the higher score on the evaluation item assigned the largest share of potential points shall be given priority in the price negotiation. However, if more than one items that have been assigned the same highest share potential points, the provider with the higher total score across those evaluation items shall have priority in the price negotiation. If the scores are still identical, a comprehensive reevaluation shall be conducted among these providers. The provider with the highest overall evaluation score, the lowest price-to-score ratio, or the lowest aggregate ranking shall be given priority for price negotiation. If the scores of each provider remain identical after this re-evaluation, priority shall be determined by drawing lots.
中文原文 機關委託專業服務廠商評選及計費辦法第8條
機關與評選優勝廠商之議價，應依下列方式辦理，並載明於招標文件：
一、優勝廠商為一家者，以議價方式辦理。
二、優勝廠商有二家以上者，依優勝順序，自最優勝者起，依序以議價方式辦理。
但有二家以上廠商為同一優勝順序者，擇配分最高之評選項目之得分合計值較高者，優先議價；如配分最高之評選項目有兩項以上者，以該等項目得分合計值較高者，優先議價；得分仍相同者，就該等廠商再進行綜合評選一次，以總評分最高、價格與總評分之商數最低或序位合計值最低者，優先議價；其再次相同者，抽籤決定之。
一、優勝廠商為一家者，以議價方式辦理。
二、優勝廠商有二家以上者，依優勝順序，自最優勝者起，依序以議價方式辦理。
但有二家以上廠商為同一優勝順序者，擇配分最高之評選項目之得分合計值較高者，優先議價；如配分最高之評選項目有兩項以上者，以該等項目得分合計值較高者，優先議價；得分仍相同者，就該等廠商再進行綜合評選一次，以總評分最高、價格與總評分之商數最低或序位合計值最低者，優先議價；其再次相同者，抽籤決定之。