Regulations for Evaluation of the Most Advantageous Tender Article 5

The evaluation items and sub-items for selecting the most advantageous tender may be chosen from the following:1. technology: such as technical specifications and performance, professional or technical personnel, professional capability, ability to fulfill contractual obligations on schedule, technical feasibility, equipment resources, training capability, maintenance capability, construction methods, economic efficiency, standardization, degree of miniaturization (compactness and lightness), requirements of the usage environment, environmental protection level, landscape maintenance, cultural preservation, natural ecological conservation, reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, consideration of the needs of disadvantaged users, project completeness, or the level of understanding of this procurement, etc;2. quality: such as quality control capability, inspection and testing methods, error detection rate, ease of operation, ease of maintenance, precision, safety, stability, reliability, esthetic attractiveness, comfort of use, failure rate, sturdiness, durability, service life, etc.;3. function: such as production capacity, handiness, versatility, expandability, compatibility, adaptability, special effects, etc.;4. management: such as organizational structure, workforce qualifications and composition, work interface handling, schedule management, management of procurement operations necessary for contract performance, site management, safety and health management, security maintenance, accounting system, financial condition, project management capability, subcontracting plan, etc.;5. commercial terms: such as contract period, term of payment, supplier’s remittance promise to entity, maintenance service schedule, after sale service, warranty period, document preparation, etc.;6. past achievements in contract performance: such as record of contract performance, experience, track record, compliance with regulatory requirements, user evaluation, efficiency in timely contract performance, record of cost control for contract performance, employee-employer relations, instances of man-caused disastrous incidents, the responsible person of the bidder or any other supplier, whose business operations have been published on the Government Procurement Gazette by the entity pursuant to Paragraph 3, Article 102 of this Act, etc;7. price: such as the correctiveness, completeness, and reasonableness of total tender price and its composition, circumstance of tender price exceeding budget amount or government estimate, discount, cost control measures for contract performance, subsequent utilization or operating costs, maintenance costs, residual value, scrap handling expense, cost effectiveness, etc.;8. financial plan: such as projection of operational revenues and expenses, fund raising plan, annual cash flow, investment benefit analysis, etc., for projects opened to private investors to build or operate referred to in Article 99 of the Act; and9. any other matters related to the function or benefit of procurement.
中文原文 最有利標評選辦法第5條
最有利標之評選項目及子項,得就下列事項擇定之:
一、技術。
如技術規格性能、專業或技術人力、專業能力、如期履約能力、技術可行性、設備資源、訓練能力、維修能力、施工方法、經濟性、標準化、輕薄短小程度、使用環境需求、環境保護程度、景觀維護、文化保存、自然生態保育、減少溫室氣體排放、考量弱勢使用者之需要、計畫之完整性或對本採購之瞭解程度等。
二、品質。
如品質管制能力、檢驗測試方法、偵錯率、操作容易度、維修容易度、精密度、安全性、穩定性、可靠度、美觀、使用舒適度、故障率、耐用性、耐久性或使用壽命等。
三、功能。
如產能、便利性、多樣性、擴充性、相容性、前瞻性或特殊效能等。
四、管理。
如組織架構、人員素質及組成、工作介面處理、期程管理、履約所需採購作業管理、工地管理、安全衛生管理、安全維護、會計制度、財務狀況、財務管理、計畫管理能力或分包計畫等。
五、商業條款。
如履約期限、付款條件、廠商承諾給付機關情形、維修服務時間、售後服務、保固期或文件備置等。
六、過去履約績效。
如履約紀錄、經驗、實績、法令之遵守、使用者評價、如期履約效率、履約成本控制紀錄、勞雇關係、人為災害事故、投標廠商負責人或以其為負責人之其他廠商遭機關依本法第一百零二條第三項規定刊登政府採購公報等情形。
七、價格。
如總標價及其組成之正確性、完整性、合理性、超預算或超底價情形、折讓、履約成本控制方式、後續使用或營運成本、維修成本、殘值、報廢處理費用或成本效益等。
八、財務計畫。
如本法第九十九條開放廠商投資興建、營運案件之營運收支預估、資金籌措計畫、分年現金流量或投資效益分析等。
九、其他與採購之功能或效益相關之事項。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.