Regulations for Evaluation of the Most Advantageous Tender Article 15-1
Where an entity selects the most advantageous tender pursuant to subparagraphs 1 or 3 of paragraph 1 of the preceding Article, and where more than two suppliers are ranked first and eligible to be the candidates of an award, the winning tenderer may be determined in accordance with one of the following approaches. However, if the number of comprehensive evaluation has reached the three times limit as set out in Article 56 of the Act, the most advantageous tender shall be determined directly by drawing lots.1. A comprehensive evaluation shall be carried out one more time on suppliers with equal overall summed ranking, the one that attains the lowest overall summed ranking shall be the winning supplier. When the overall summed ranking of each supplier is still equal after such comprehensive evaluation, the winning supplier shall be determined by drawing lots.2. The supplier that attains a higher summed score on the evaluation item that has been assigned the highest rating shall be the winning supplier. If the score of each supplier is still equal, the winning supplier shall be determined by drawing lots.3. The supplier that attains more first ranking evaluated by committee members than other suppliers shall be the winning supplier. If they are still equal, the winning supplier shall be determined by drawing lots.
中文原文 最有利標評選辦法第15-1條
依前條第一項第一款或第三款評定最有利標，序位第一之廠商有二家以上，且均得為決標對象時，得以下列方式之一決定最有利標廠商。
但其綜合評選次數已達本法第五十六條規定之三次限制者，逕行抽籤決定之。
一、對序位合計值相同廠商再行綜合評選一次，以序位合計值最低者決標。
綜合評選後之序位合計值仍相同者，抽籤決定之。
二、擇配分最高之評選項目之得分合計值較高者決標。
得分仍相同者，抽籤決定之。
三、擇獲得評選委員評定序位第一較多者決標；仍相同者，抽籤決定之。
但其綜合評選次數已達本法第五十六條規定之三次限制者，逕行抽籤決定之。
一、對序位合計值相同廠商再行綜合評選一次，以序位合計值最低者決標。
綜合評選後之序位合計值仍相同者，抽籤決定之。
二、擇配分最高之評選項目之得分合計值較高者決標。
得分仍相同者，抽籤決定之。
三、擇獲得評選委員評定序位第一較多者決標；仍相同者，抽籤決定之。