Regulations for Evaluation of the Most Advantageous Tender Article 14
Where the most advantageous tender is selected pursuant to the approaches set out in the preceding article or subparagraph 1 or 3 of Article 12, and where more than two suppliers have attained the same highest overall evaluated score or lowest quotient of price divided by overall evaluated score and are eligible to be the candidate of an award, the supplier of the most advantageous tender may be determined in accordance with one of the following approaches. However, if the number of comprehensive evaluation has reached the three times limit as set out in Article 56 of the Act, the most advantageous tender shall be determined directly by drawing lots.1. A comprehensive evaluation shall be carried out one more time on suppliers with equal overall evaluated scores or quotients, the one that attains the highest overall evaluated score or the lowest quotient of price divided by overall evaluated score shall be the winning supplier. When the overall evaluated score or quotient is still equal after such comprehensive evaluation, the winning supplier shall be determined by drawing lots.2. The supplier which attains a higher score on the evaluation item that has been assigned the highest score shall be the wining supplier. If the scores are still equal, the winning supplier shall be determined by drawing lots.
中文原文 最有利標評選辦法第14條
依第十二條第一款、第三款或前條方式評定最有利標，總評分最高或價格與總評分之商數最低之廠商，有二家以上相同，且均得為決標對象時，得以下列方式之一決定最有利標廠商。
但其綜合評選次數已達本法第五十六條規定之三次限制者，逕行抽籤決定之。
一、對總評分或商數相同廠商再行綜合評選一次，以總評分最高或價格與總評分之商數最低者決標。
綜合評選後之總評分或商數仍相同者，抽籤決定之。
二、擇配分最高之評選項目之得分較高者決標。
得分仍相同者，抽籤決定之。
但其綜合評選次數已達本法第五十六條規定之三次限制者，逕行抽籤決定之。
一、對總評分或商數相同廠商再行綜合評選一次，以總評分最高或價格與總評分之商數最低者決標。
綜合評選後之總評分或商數仍相同者，抽籤決定之。
二、擇配分最高之評選項目之得分較高者決標。
得分仍相同者，抽籤決定之。