Regulation for the Implementation of Inter-entity Supply Contracts Article 9

The Contract shall state explicitly that the contracting entity may negotiate with the supplier for amending the Contract if the supplier, during the available time period for placing orders of the Contract, offers any person the subject of the Contract by more favorable price or condition.Where the supplier refuses to lower the price without reasonable cause, the contracting entity may terminate the Contract.When a contracting entity discovers that the market price declines significantly during the available time period for placing orders of the Contract, the entity shall check the price of the subject provided by the suppliers and take action pursuant to the preceding paragraph.Where an applicable entity discovers that the contract price is higher than the market price, the entity shall not make use of the Contract to conduct procurement and shall notify the contracting entity.Other entities shall, prior to using the Contract to conduct procurement, undertake a survey of market price of the subject that meets its requirement in general market. If the results of survey reveal that the price of the subject in the Contract is higher than the market price, the entity shall not use the Contract to conduct procurement.Where conducting a procurement in accordance with the Contract, an entity may, under various range of quantity or value prescribed in the Contract, take into account the quantity or value of the order, or the terms and conditions otherwise specified in the Contract to request the supplier to offer a more favorable price or terms and conditions.
中文原文 共同供應契約實施辦法第9條
本契約應明定,於可供訂購之期間,訂約廠商以更優惠之價格或條件供應本契約之標的於不特定對象者,訂約機關得與訂約廠商協議變更本契約。
訂約廠商無合理事由而不減價者,訂約機關得終止契約。
訂約機關於本契約可供訂購之期間,發現市場行情明顯下降時,應就訂約廠商供應標的之價格辦理查價,俾供訂約機關依前項規定辦理。
適用機關發現本契約價格高於市場行情者,不得利用本契約辦理採購,並應通報訂約機關。
其他機關利用本契約辦理採購前,應就一般市場符合需求之標的辦理查價。
查價結果發現本契約之價格高於市場行情者,不得利用本契約辦理採購。
機關利用本契約辦理採購,得考量其於契約所載不同數量或金額級距下之訂購數量、金額或有別於本契約之條件,洽訂約廠商提供更優惠之價格或條件。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.