The Taxpayer Rights Protection Act Article 21
If a taxpayer is dissatisfied with a tax assessment and, after the recheck decision, files an appeal or administrative litigation, he or she may amend or add reasons why the tax assessment is illegal prior to the time when a decision is made by the administrative appeal review committee, or the end of oral argument in an administrative court adjudicating issues of facts, and the agency with jurisdiction of administrative appeal or the administrative court shall consider such reasons. The same applies when the agency with jurisdiction of administrative appeal or the administrative court finds ex officio that the tax assessment is illegal.In a case referred to in the preceding paragraph, the tax authorities shall file a reply and state specifically and clearly its opinions of the amended or added reasons.Administrative courts shall investigate evidence to verify taxpayers’ tax payable and determine the amount within the range set by a taxpayer’s challenge, except for complex cases which are difficult to investigate.During an administrative litigation filed by a taxpayer due to his or her dissatisfaction with the tax assessment, recheck, or administrative appeal, if the tax assessment, recheck, or administrative appeal is revoked or amended by a court because of illegality after the taking effect of this Act, and the tax payable has not become final after the expiry of a 15-year period from the day on which the judgment is made, the tax payable may no longer be assessed. However, if the tax payable has not become final due to the taxpayer’s intentional delay of the litigation process or caused by other reasons beyond the control of mankind, the tax payable may still be assessed.The preceding paragraph applies mutatis mutandis to the surcharge and belated surcharge (Article 20 of the Tax Collection Act ), interests, delinquent reporting surcharges, non-reporting surcharges, and fines.
中文原文 納稅者權利保護法第21條
納稅者不服課稅處分,經復查決定後提起行政爭訟,於訴願審議委員會決議前或行政訴訟事實審言詞辯論終結前,得追加或變更主張課稅處分違法事由,受理訴願機關或行政法院應予審酌。
其由受理訴願機關或行政法院依職權發現課稅處分違法者,亦同。
前項情形,稅捐稽徵機關應提出答辯書狀,具體表明對於該追加或變更事由之意見。
行政法院對於納稅者之應納稅額,應查明事證以核實確認,在納稅者聲明不服之範圍內定其數額。
但因案情複雜而難以查明者,不在此限。
納稅者不服課稅處分、復查或訴願決定提出行政爭訟之案件,其課稅處分、復查或訴願決定自本法施行後因違法而受法院撤銷或變更,自法院作成撤銷或變更裁判之日起逾十五年未能確定其應納稅額者,不得再行核課。
但逾期係因納稅者之故意延滯訴訟或因其他不可抗力之事由所致者,不在此限。
滯納金、利息、滯報金、怠報金及罰鍰等,準用前項規定。
其由受理訴願機關或行政法院依職權發現課稅處分違法者,亦同。
前項情形,稅捐稽徵機關應提出答辯書狀,具體表明對於該追加或變更事由之意見。
行政法院對於納稅者之應納稅額,應查明事證以核實確認,在納稅者聲明不服之範圍內定其數額。
但因案情複雜而難以查明者,不在此限。
納稅者不服課稅處分、復查或訴願決定提出行政爭訟之案件,其課稅處分、復查或訴願決定自本法施行後因違法而受法院撤銷或變更,自法院作成撤銷或變更裁判之日起逾十五年未能確定其應納稅額者,不得再行核課。
但逾期係因納稅者之故意延滯訴訟或因其他不可抗力之事由所致者,不在此限。
滯納金、利息、滯報金、怠報金及罰鍰等,準用前項規定。