Regulations for Handling Disputes over the Application and Evaluation Procedures for Cases Concerning Private Participation in Infrastructure Projects Article 26
A review decision shall indicate whether the authority in charge has violated the Act or any applicable laws or regulations. Where there is any violation, the authority in charge shall otherwise handle the case in accordance with the law.During pre-examination of a complaint, if the pre-examination members consider it necessary to suspend an application and review procedure, the members may propose the same to the Complaint Review Board, and upon a resolution by the board, the Complaint Review Board shall give the authority in charge a notice to suspend the procedure, and the authority in charge shall do as notified. However, if the pre-examination members consider there is an urgent need to suspend the procedure, the board may solicitate the opinions of all the board members in writing, and suspend the procedure upon consent of a majority of the board members.When giving a notice under the preceding paragraph, the Complaint Review Board shall take into consideration public interests, the interests of the applicants concerned, and other relevant situations.
中文原文 民間參與公共建設申請及審核程序爭議處理規則第26條
審議判斷書應指明主辦機關有無違反本法及有關法令;經指明其有違反者,主辦機關應另為適法之處置。
預審委員審議申訴事件,認為有必要者,經提報申訴會委員會議決議後,得通知主辦機關暫停申請及審核程序,主辦機關應依通知辦理。
但預審委員認時間急迫,應及時處理者,申訴會得以書面徵詢全體委員之意見,獲過半數委員之書面同意後暫停之。
申訴會為前項之通知時,應考量公共利益、相關申請人之利益及其他有關情況。
預審委員審議申訴事件,認為有必要者,經提報申訴會委員會議決議後,得通知主辦機關暫停申請及審核程序,主辦機關應依通知辦理。
但預審委員認時間急迫,應及時處理者,申訴會得以書面徵詢全體委員之意見,獲過半數委員之書面同意後暫停之。
申訴會為前項之通知時,應考量公共利益、相關申請人之利益及其他有關情況。