Military trial Article 218
After the verdict of guilty has been decided, if one of the following situations affects the benefits of person who receives the verdict, he can request for the retrial: 1. The evidences on which the original verdict based have been proved as counterfeited or differently-made. 2. The testimony, appraisal or translation of the original verdict is based on have been proved false. 3. The person who receives the verdict has proved to be calumniated.4. The judgment of military court on which the original verdict is based has been altered. 5. If Military justice administer participating in the original verdict, verdict before the trial or investigations before the verdict, or military attorney general participating in the investigation or the lawsuit committed crimes in their posts out of the case and the crimes have been proved. Or they neglect their duties out of the case and have been punished but their behaviors are sufficient to affect the original verdict. 6. Because of the new evidences, the person who is judged as guilty should receive the verdict of innocence, abolished of the crime and the punishment, or receive the verdict that is lighter than the first verdict. 7. When the original verdict has no investigation over the evidences that are enough to affect the verdict.The manifestation of situations of item 1 to 3 and item 5,after the verdict decided on the halt and discontinuation of the trial, can request for the retrial if it is not restricted in the insufficient evidence.
中文原文 軍事審判法第218條
有罪之判決確定後，有下列情形之一者，為受判決人之利益，得聲請再審︰一、原判決所憑之證物，已證明其為偽造或變造者。
二、原判決所憑之證言、鑑定或通譯，已證明其為虛偽者。
三、受有罪判決之人，已證明其係被誣告者。
四、原判決所憑之法院或軍事法院之裁判，已經確定裁判變更者。
五、參與原判決或前審判決或判決前所行調查之軍事審判官，或參與偵查或起訴之軍事檢察官，因該案件犯職務上之罪，已經證明者，或因該案件違法失職已受懲戒或懲罰處分，足以影響原判決者。
六、因發見確實之新證據，足認受有罪判決之人，應受無罪、免訴、免刑或輕於原判決所認罪名之判決者。
七、原判決對足生影響判決之重要證據，漏未調查或審酌者。
前項第一款至第三款及第五款情形之證明，以經判決確定，或其軍事審判不能開始或續行，非因證據不足者為限，得聲請再審。
二、原判決所憑之證言、鑑定或通譯，已證明其為虛偽者。
三、受有罪判決之人，已證明其係被誣告者。
四、原判決所憑之法院或軍事法院之裁判，已經確定裁判變更者。
五、參與原判決或前審判決或判決前所行調查之軍事審判官，或參與偵查或起訴之軍事檢察官，因該案件犯職務上之罪，已經證明者，或因該案件違法失職已受懲戒或懲罰處分，足以影響原判決者。
六、因發見確實之新證據，足認受有罪判決之人，應受無罪、免訴、免刑或輕於原判決所認罪名之判決者。
七、原判決對足生影響判決之重要證據，漏未調查或審酌者。
前項第一款至第三款及第五款情形之證明，以經判決確定，或其軍事審判不能開始或續行，非因證據不足者為限，得聲請再審。