Compensation Act for Wrongful Trials on Charges of Sedition and Espionage during the Martial Law Period Article 8
One may not apply for compensation in any of the following circumstances:1. One has already received compensation according to the Wrongful Imprisonment Compensation or the Compensation for the 228-Incident based on the same facts; 2. The conviction for sedition or treason survives reviews according to the current laws or the current evidence laws.The review mentioned in the second subparagraph of the preceding paragraph shall be done case-by-case by a reviewing committee set up by the foundation.The reviewing committee mentioned in the second paragraph shall consist of scholars, righteous citizens from the community, judges, and representatives of the government. Members of the reviewing committee do not necessarily come from the board of the foundation, but at least a half of them shall have the experiences or currently working as judges, prosecutors, or lawyers. The procedure and the result of the selection of the members of the reviewing committee shall be reported to the Executive Yuan by the foundation for review and approval.The foundation may not nullify or modify the decision of the reviewing committee without the approval of two third of the attending board members in a formal board meeting. In this meeting, at least half of all board members must attend. But if the modification to the decision of the reviewing committee by the foundation has a negative effect on the applicant, the case shall be remanded to the reviewing committee. The foundation may remand the case to the committee only once.
中文原文 戒嚴時期不當叛亂暨匪諜審判案件補償條例第8條
有下列情形之一者,不得申請補償:
一、因同一原因事實,已依法受領冤獄賠償或二二八事件補償者。
二、依現行法律或證據法則審查,經認定觸犯內亂罪、外患罪確有實據者。
前項第二款之認定,由基金會設置審查小組就個案逐一審認之。
第二項審查小組,由學者專家、社會公正人士、法官、政府代表共同組成,不以董事為限,其中曾任或現任法官、檢察官、律師之人數,不得少於二分之一;其遴選方式及人選,由基金會報請行政院核備之。
基金會對於審查小組之決定,非經二分之一以上董事出席董事會,以出席董事三分之二以上同意,不得撤銷或變更之。
但對審查小組之補償決定,基金會如為不利之變更,應移請審查小組再行審查。
再行審查以一次為限。
一、因同一原因事實,已依法受領冤獄賠償或二二八事件補償者。
二、依現行法律或證據法則審查,經認定觸犯內亂罪、外患罪確有實據者。
前項第二款之認定,由基金會設置審查小組就個案逐一審認之。
第二項審查小組,由學者專家、社會公正人士、法官、政府代表共同組成,不以董事為限,其中曾任或現任法官、檢察官、律師之人數,不得少於二分之一;其遴選方式及人選,由基金會報請行政院核備之。
基金會對於審查小組之決定,非經二分之一以上董事出席董事會,以出席董事三分之二以上同意,不得撤銷或變更之。
但對審查小組之補償決定,基金會如為不利之變更,應移請審查小組再行審查。
再行審查以一次為限。