Regulations for the Cooperation between National Defense Technology Institutions and Private Entities for Research, Development, Production, Manufacture and Maintenance Article 23

This English translation was last updated on 2023-05-08, but the Chinese text was amended on 2026-10-30. Later amendments may not be reflected in the translation — please refer to the Chinese text.

When a National Defense Technology Institutions accepts a commission from a Private Entity to engage in research and development, production and manufacture, or maintenance and repair items, it shall select such items according to the following principles:Subparagraph (1)The first Priority shall be the research and development, production and manufacture, or maintenance and repair items for which the National Defense Technology Institutions possesses special technology, capability, or resources to engage in.Subparagraph (2)The first Priority shall be those production items whose original place of manufacture and production is not inside our country.Subparagraph (3)Items which can promote the development of the national defense technology industry's products specifically for military use, or common military and civilian use.Subparagraph (4)Items which can reasonably and effectively make use of current resources, and which are beneficial to the property revenue [of the National Defense Technology Institutions].Subparagraph (5)Items which shall not affect the National Defense Technology Institutions' duty to provide military supplies.Subparagraph (6)The National Defense Technology Institutions shall not select items for which the domestic private sector already possesses total capability and can effectively supply the same to meet the national defense requirements.
中文原文 國防部科技工業機構與法人團體從事研發產製維修辦法第23條
科技工業機構接受法人團體委託從事研發、產製或維修之項目,應依下列原則選定之:
一、科技工業機構具有特殊技術能力或資源從事之研發、產製或維修項目為優先。
二、原製造生產地不在國內之量產項目為優先。
三、能促進國防科技工業軍事專用或軍民通用產品發展之項目。
四、能合理有效運用現有資源,且有利於財產收益之項目。
五、不得影響科技工業機構軍需供給任務之項目。
六、不得選定國內民間已具完整能量,足以有效供應國防需求之項目。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.