Urban Renewal Act Article 53

Landowners that disagree with the rights value after the right transformation plan is approved, announced and executed shall apply to competent authorities with written statement within the two months since the date of executing the proposal. The competent authorities shall manage the dissension and deliberate for decision making within three months. Extensions for the deliberation period are permitted under the circumstance that technical assistance or consultation from professional association or institute is required by the competent authorities. The extension period is another three months. The party could file administrative remedy procedures by law if the party does not comply with the results.During the period of disagreement inspection or administrative remedy procedure, the implementers must continue the urban renewal project unless have the approval from the authority.If the results of disagreement handling or administrative remedy in first paragraph are different from the original apprised price; both parties must settle the price difference in cash.The period of disagreement inspection in first paragraph shall deduct the time spending on technical consultation made by technical group or institution that are authorized by competent authority and on rights value re-evaluation made by technical group or institution that are authorized by implementers.
中文原文 都市更新條例第53條
權利變換計畫書核定發布實施後二個月內,土地所有權人對其權利價值有異議時,應以書面敘明理由,向各級主管機關提出,各級主管機關應於受理異議後三個月內審議核復。
但因情形特殊,經各級主管機關認有委託專業團體或機構協助作技術性諮商之必要者,得延長審議核復期限三個月。
當事人對審議核復結果不服者,得依法提請行政救濟。
前項異議處理或行政救濟期間,實施者非經主管機關核准,不得停止都市更新事業之進行。
第一項異議處理或行政救濟結果與原評定價值有差額部分,由當事人以現金相互找補。
第一項審議核復期限,應扣除各級主管機關委託專業團體或機構協助作技術性諮商及實施者委託專業團體或機構重新查估權利價值之時間。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.