Urban Renewal Act Article 37

An implementer submitting an established or changed urban renewal project plan for approval shall acquire the consent of a certain percentage of the private land and private legal building owners that together account for a certain percentage of the total land area. The percentage calculation shall be conducted according to the regulations below. However, if the private land and private legal building owners giving their consent account for over 90% of the total land area, the number of owners need not be calculated.1. Where an urban renewal project corporation is delegated through open selection according to Article 12, the consent of more than half of both the private land and private legal building owners in the renewal unit shall be acquired, and the total land area and the total floor area such private land and private legal building owners shall account for more than half of the entire land area and floor area. If the public land exceeds half of the land of the renewal unit, acquisition of the consent of the private land and private legal building owners shall not be required. The implementer shall guarantee the value of the rights of private land and private legal building owners after the rights transfer is not lower than the standard stipulated in related urban renewal regulations.2. According to Article 22:(1) The renewal area demarcated or changed to undergo urban renewal according to Article 7 shall require the consent of more than half of the private land and private legal building owners in the renewal unit and the total land area and floor area of the legal buildings of such owners shall also account for more than half of the entire land area and floor area.(2) Other renewal areas to undergo renewal shall require the consent of more than three-quarters of the private land and private legal building owners in the renewal unit and the land area and floor area of the legal buildings of such owners shall also be more than three quarters of the entire land area and floor area.3. According to Article 23: The consent of more than four-fifths of the private land and private legal building owners in the renewal unit shall be required and the land area and floor area of the legal buildings of such owners shall also account for more than four-fifths of the entire land area and floor area.The computation of the proportion between the number of persons and the ownership of the lands and buildings mentioned in the preceding paragraph can be done to the regulations in Article 24.When an urban renewal project is conducted in two or more approaches, the percentages of number of people and land area and floor area shall be calculated separately. The same principle shall apply when the ratio of consent described in Paragraph 2 of Article 22 is calculated.Competent authorities should verify the proportion of agreement by the end of the exhibition, except the affairs ruled in Article 88, Article 89, and Article 92 in civil law or both of the two ends agree the revoke. If the value of allocated rights or the percentage allocated is lower than the rate when the letters of consent are issued, the owners may revoke their consent before the public exhibition comes to a conclusion.
中文原文 都市更新條例第37條
實施者擬訂或變更都市更新事業計畫報核時,應經一定比率之私有土地與私有合法建築物所有權人數及所有權面積之同意;其同意比率依下列規定計算。
但私有土地及私有合法建築物所有權面積均超過十分之九同意者,其所有權人數不予計算:
一、依第十二條規定經公開評選委託都市更新事業機構辦理者:應經更新單元內私有土地及私有合法建築物所有權人均超過二分之一,且其所有土地總面積及合法建築物總樓地板面積均超過二分之一之同意。
但公有土地面積超過更新單元面積二分之一者,免取得私有土地及私有合法建築物之同意。
實施者應保障私有土地及私有合法建築物所有權人權利變換後之權利價值,不得低於都市更新相關法規之規定。
二、依第二十二條規定辦理者:
(一)依第七條規定劃定或變更之更新地區,應經更新單元內私有土地及私有合法建築物所有權人均超過二分之一,且其所有土地總面積及合法建築物總樓地板面積均超過二分之一之同意。
(二)其餘更新地區,應經更新單元內私有土地及私有合法建築物所有權人均超過四分之三,且其所有土地總面積及合法建築物總樓地板面積均超過四分之三之同意。
三、依第二十三條規定辦理者:應經更新單元內私有土地及私有合法建築物所有權人均超過五分之四,且其所有土地總面積及合法建築物總樓地板面積均超過五分之四之同意。
前項人數與土地及建築物所有權比率之計算,準用第二十四條之規定。
都市更新事業以二種以上方式處理時,第一項人數與面積比率,應分別計算之。
第二十二條第二項同意比率之計算,亦同。
各級主管機關對第一項同意比率之審核,除有民法第八十八條、第八十九條、第九十二條規定情事或雙方合意撤銷者外,以都市更新事業計畫公開展覽期滿時為準。
所有權人對於公開展覽之計畫所載更新後分配之權利價值比率或分配比率低於出具同意書時者,得於公開展覽期滿前,撤銷其同意。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.