Land Expropriation Act Article 22
If any person with an interest in the expropriated land or land improvement objects to the matters being publicly announced as referred to in Paragraph 1 of Article 18 herein, he shall raise the objection by submitting a written statement to the municipal or county (city) competent authority within the announcement period. Upon receiving such an objection, the municipal or county (city) competent authority shall forthwith investigate the matter and notify the interested person of the findings and actions taken in writing.Where an interested person has objection to the amount of compensation for the expropriated land or land improvement, he may, within thirty (30) days from next day following the expiration of the public announcement period, raise the objection by submitting a written statement to the municipal or county (city) competent authority. Upon receiving such an objection, the municipal or county (city) competent authority shall forthwith investigate the matter and notify the interested person of the findings and decision made thereon in writing.In case the interested person disagrees with the decision referred to in the preceding paragraph, the municipal or county (city) competent authority may refer the matter to the Land Evaluation Committee for reconsideration. If the interested person still disagrees with the result of reconsideration, he may file for administrative remedy according to law.Should the municipal or county (city) competent authority have distributed the compensation in accordance with Article 20 herein, the implementation of an expropriation plan will not be suspended when an interested person raises an objection or files for administrative remedy in accordance with the preceding three paragraphs.In case the amount of compensation is adjusted based on the result of reconsideration or administrative remedy or the original compensation is determined to be erroneous after the compensation has been distributed in full according to law, any additional compensation thereof shall be paid within three months from the day on which the definitive amount is determined.
中文原文 土地徵收條例第22條
權利關係人對於第十八條第一項之公告事項有異議者，得於公告期間內向該管直轄市或縣（市）主管機關以書面提出。
該管直轄市或縣（市）主管機關接受異議後應即查明處理，並將查處情形以書面通知權利關係人。
權利關係人對於徵收補償價額有異議者，得於公告期間屆滿之次日起三十日內以書面向該管直轄市或縣（市）主管機關提出異議，該管直轄市或縣（市）主管機關於接受異議後應即查明處理，並將查處情形以書面通知權利關係人。
權利關係人對於前項查處不服者，該管直轄市或縣（市）主管機關得提請地價評議委員會復議，權利關係人不服復議結果者，得依法提起行政救濟。
直轄市或縣（市）主管機關依第二十條規定發給補償費完竣後，徵收計畫之執行，不因權利關係人依前三項規定提出異議或提起行政救濟而停止。
徵收補償價額經復議、行政救濟結果有變動或補償費經依法發給完竣，嗣經發現原補償價額認定錯誤者，其應補償價額差額，應於其結果確定之日起三個月內發給之。
該管直轄市或縣（市）主管機關接受異議後應即查明處理，並將查處情形以書面通知權利關係人。
權利關係人對於徵收補償價額有異議者，得於公告期間屆滿之次日起三十日內以書面向該管直轄市或縣（市）主管機關提出異議，該管直轄市或縣（市）主管機關於接受異議後應即查明處理，並將查處情形以書面通知權利關係人。
權利關係人對於前項查處不服者，該管直轄市或縣（市）主管機關得提請地價評議委員會復議，權利關係人不服復議結果者，得依法提起行政救濟。
直轄市或縣（市）主管機關依第二十條規定發給補償費完竣後，徵收計畫之執行，不因權利關係人依前三項規定提出異議或提起行政救濟而停止。
徵收補償價額經復議、行政救濟結果有變動或補償費經依法發給完竣，嗣經發現原補償價額認定錯誤者，其應補償價額差額，應於其結果確定之日起三個月內發給之。