Administrative Appeal Act Article 66
The procedures of the oral argument are stipulated as follows:1. The agency with jurisdiction of administrative appeal states the summary of the case.2. The administrative appellant, intervenor appellant, or administrative appeal representative states the issue of fact and the issue of law.3. The agency which the administrative action was made states the issue of fact and the issue of law.4. The agency with jurisdiction of administrative appeal or the agency which the administrative action was made to state the opinion concerning the opposition parties or defense the statement or the defense of the opposition parties.5. The agency with jurisdiction of administrative appeal to inquire the administrative appellant or the agency which the administrative action was made.While the oral argument stipulated in last Paragraph is uncompleted, a secondary oral argument may be allowed.
中文原文 訴願法第66條
言詞辯論之程序如左:
一、受理訴願機關陳述事件要旨。
二、訴願人、參加人或訴願代理人就事件為事實上及法律上之陳述。
三、原行政處分機關就事件為事實上及法律上之陳述。
四、訴願或原行政處分機關對他方之陳述或答辯,為再答辯。
五、受理訴願機關對訴願人及原行政處分機關提出詢問。
前項辯論未完備者,得再為辯論。
一、受理訴願機關陳述事件要旨。
二、訴願人、參加人或訴願代理人就事件為事實上及法律上之陳述。
三、原行政處分機關就事件為事實上及法律上之陳述。
四、訴願或原行政處分機關對他方之陳述或答辯,為再答辯。
五、受理訴願機關對訴願人及原行政處分機關提出詢問。
前項辯論未完備者,得再為辯論。